|
Printed
from BasicTips.com,
FREE helpful articles
and tips for Webmasters and Business Owners
Copyright © 1994-2006
by BasicTips.com, a division of BasicTemplates.BIZ
All rights reserved. Republication in whole or in part in any form is not permitted.
Sponsored by BasicTemplates.BIZ
Website
Templates with External CSS and
Removable Graphics
http://www.BasicTemplates.biz
Co-Sponsored by Effective-Website-Secrets.com
Teaching webmasters effective web development and marketing techniques
via free podcasts.
http://www.Effective-Website-Secrets.com
Category: Web Design
Should you Use CSS-P (Table-Less Layouts) on Your Web Site?
By BasicTemplates with External CSS
Unless you anticipate the main traffic to your site will be impressed with a pure CSS-P site (if for example, you are selling an item that impresses upon people to buy based on how your site is designed), I would not recommend using complete and exact CSS positioning. Many of today's browsers are just not up to speed with CSS-P. I admit that CSS-P looks neat and crisp but is likely not the best choice for the majority of diversified web sites online.
Why? I guess the best way to illustrate this is to send you to some of the top dogs in the industry. Look at their source code. All of them use external or internal CSS with *HTML tables*. They do not use pure CSS-P.
These sites are listed as some of the top 50 visited sites on the net (as of today) and receive a diversified group of visitors - not just large corporations, web designers, etc.
mapquest.com infospace.com amazon.com yahoo.com ebay.com microsoft.com cnn.com weather.com match.com nytimes.com webshots.com pogo.com about.com dell.com tripod.com real.com expedia.com iwon.com
I'd also suggest running these sites through *very old* browsers (NS4 and below, MIE 5 and below, etc.) and see how well they display. You might try running them through the validators at W3C too. I think you might just be surprised at the results.
|